Thoughts on Student Handbooks and Discipline

Tomorrow I start my immersion experience for EDTEC 670. I will be participating in a rewrite of the local high school student handbook. As I've been reading it I have wondered why we treat teens as potential criminals with the multitude of thou shalt nots and severe consequences. It is impossible for even the best student to avoid a "run in with the school law" completely. When did we become so dictatorial in our approach to schools? Why does a few bad apples make it a rotten environment for everyone? Is it any wonder that the general attitude is that school is a place you have to survive, and the concept of enjoying learning is lost? I don't think teachers like it any better than the students.
So, my next blog will report on my first meeting with the group. I don't hold out much hope for a more charitable viewpoint, but at least I will know I made the effort.

Educating for Freedom?

A headline (Budget Cuts Harm Curriculum) caught my eye as I was about to start this blog. Deeper Holes in Public Education
Another headline earlier in the week noted that the federal government is thinking about cutting the E2T2 budget (the funding for increasing technology in public education) Bush budget again would cut E2T2 .
An article I read this week talked about the philosophical difference between general education and vocational education. General Education v. Vocational Education
So, where am I going with all of this?
How do these ideas and policies affect what we are doing in education? Are we educating to increase the freedoms of our citizens? Are we really providing expanded educational opportunities for everyone, or are we ending up limiting their choices? My daughter pointed out this week that the primary problem with NCLB is the concept of "left behind." At what point is someone left behind? Think about runners in a race. Is the person in second place being left behind, or the person in third place? What about the runners in the middle? How do you encourage someone to achieve at their best if it means someone else can't meet the same standard? Who decides who is being left behind? Do we lower our standards? Do we discourage high-achievers? Where do we draw the line?
I am reminded of something that relates to my religious beliefs -- I believe that prior to this earth life there was a discussion about who would be the Savior. Christ said he would go. Then Satan said he would go, and he would make sure everyone passed the earth-life test, and returned to heaven, but he wanted God's glory if he did. God said he would send Christ. Satan rebelled, and a war in heaven ensued, in which 1/3 followed Satan. The point of this is, the war was fought over the concept of whether it is right to force people to succeed -- our agency as humans was at stake.
Are we fighting this same war with NCLB? I keep asking myself if that is what the bottom line is. Of course, someone who doesn't share my religious beliefs might not have this same perspective....but, do we have the right to force someone to pass school? We have the obligation to provide equivalent opportunities for anyone who wants to succeed to do so -- and I think that is the good intent of NCLB -- but what about the not so good intent that seems to have developed because the government says if you don't do it, we'll punish you? How much control do we really have over learning? We can teach -- but will the learner learn? Isn't that what NCLB is telling us to do: force the learner to learn? Does this provide additional educational opportunities for everyone, or force everyone into a standardized mold where we cut off vital parts if you don't happen to fit the mold? That sounds like slavery to me. A free people should not tolerate it. So, what do you think? Are our educational policies helping or hurting our future freedom?

My First Post

Ok, I just went through the process of setting up a blog. This was harder than I thought -- the technology wasn't that big a deal, but coming up with a title? What should I call this thing? That took forever. Finally I settled on Kithaven Connections, as you can see. So, why that title?
It goes back to two things. First, Kithaven is the name of my craft business, and it has its derivation from the idea of Kith, Kin, and Haven -- as in a place of refuge for all. Connections -- I was reminded of an article I read early on this semester for my Educational Foundations class. It was entitled "Only Connect" (William Cronon, from The American Scholar, Volume 67, 1998 Autumn) and it said that is the point of a liberal education -- we need to connect. Since I have also studied communications, that article connected with me. As we connect with (understand) each other, we are more successful in every aspect of life. So, I hope to connect with some of you using this blog.